911: Ripple Effect

Mikey 7 comments
  • Conspiracy
911: Ripple Effect

Adding fuel to the fire that is the 911 conspiracy documentary Loose Change, comes this effort from the producers of 911 - In Plane Sight, entitled 911: Ripple Effect.

Just like the two aforementioned documentaries, 911: Ripple Effect is full of expert testimonial (take that as you will) and a new conspiracy theory that is even more 'out there'.

Watch the full movie below.

Links: Official web site

Not a Member!


Monday 23rd July 2007 | 11:42 PM

well another 911 doco, and yet a lot of unanswered questions. yep i believe that bin laden is a scapegoat just like lee harvey oswald in the killing of kennedy.
there are too many experts who say similar things such as the collapse of the towers brought down like an organised demolition. no pieces of plane wreckage found at the pentagon etc.
is bush behind it or is he just a puppet on a string?

Not a Member!


Tuesday 24th July 2007 | 06:27 AM

I too was shocked after watching 911 in plane sight, having just come back from a year in Afghanistan at war. I will definitely watch the ripple effect!

Not a Member!


Tuesday 24th July 2007 | 08:26 AM

If any doco could convince me of a 911 conspiracy - it wouldn't be that one. You're right it is 'way out there' as far as conspiracies go.

Not a Member!

Bald Matrix Kid

Tuesday 24th July 2007 | 04:50 PM

There is no conspiracy

Not a Member!


Tuesday 24th July 2007 | 05:19 PM

me still thinks there is more to the 911........

Not a Member!


Wednesday 25th July 2007 | 10:49 AM

I have watched this again and I admittedly are leaning towards the conspiracy theorist's side, although only marginally.

There are some obvious flaws in the report, inconsistencies and what not. The most notable being the impact hole on the Pentagon not matching the aircraft that was supposed to have hit it.

And the BBC news reporter stating that building 7 had collapsed, and then crossing live to their reporter in Manhattan who also confirmed the building had fallen - yet you could see it clear as day right behind her. The building didn't actually come down for another 20 minutes. The suggestion here is the media were given 'scripts' or stories that had to conform too...but the BBC jumped the gun.

The controlled demolition theory is interesting but they left out some key parts. Setting up a controlled demolition of a building that size would take weeks. During that time, demolition workers would have had to have access to the building and it would have been almost impossible to conceal what they were doing. Any witnesses?

So it's one thing to say it looks like a controlled demolition but you really got to have something more than 'it looks like a controlled demolition'.

Not a Member!


Thursday 26th July 2007 | 12:36 AM

mike,good to see you are leaning a little........

Add a comment

Login to Rusty Lime

Not registered? | Forgot your Password? Cancel Login