Lunatic out-of-touch judge lets paedophile go free
Mikey 4 comments
A judge has let a rapist go free because the 10 year old victim didn't look 10. Keith Fenn, 25, has admitted raping the girl twice at a park.
The same judge, Julian Hall, caused outrage earlier this year when he set another paedophile free, saying the he should just buy the 6 year old victim a new bicycle. Justice for all.
Update: The Attorney General's office has stepped in to find out why judge Julian Hall handed down a sentence that was "pathetically lenient"
Jake Farr-Wharton
Thursday 28th June 2007 | 11:05 AMAgreed, this judge should be investigated. This is just sickening, the children will have this scar to bear for the rest of their life, a bike does not suffice, castration does and amputation of all limbs does.... masarcistic, though I have 2 young girls and have friends who were molested and one who was raped, it's just not kocher.
Hoggy
Thursday 28th June 2007 | 12:49 PMThat's on a par with what Orielly said about that teenage boy who was kidnapped and molested for years:
"there was an element here that this kid liked about his circumstances"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZLgSJ7v3Fw">
Yeah. The kid was willing to put up with captivity and being molested just so he could miss school. O'Reilly is as in touch with the people as this judge is.
Gilly
Saturday 30th June 2007 | 10:26 PMSurvival of the fittest?
Why is it wrong?
Yes I know it is wrong, it was a rhetorical question.
Rodney
Wednesday 27th June 2007 | 09:48 PMI know judges cannot be deposed by government and for good reason. This guy, however, clearly must go.
In fact, I think he should be investigated because anyone with such an attitude towards paedophiles must surely have their own practices called into question?